1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 116 Ohio
  5. 116 Ohio St.3d 167 (2007)
 

PROUSE, DASH & CROUCH v. DiMARCO

No. 2006-0957.

116 Ohio St.3d 167 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5753

PROUSE, DASH & CROUCH, L.L.P., Appellant, v. DiMARCO et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 31, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindner & Jordan, L.L.P, and Daniel F. Lindner, for appellant.

Mancino, Mancino & Mancino and Paul Mancino Jr., for appellees.

PFEIFER, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over appellees, Bruce DiMarco ("DiMarco"), an American citizen, and his wife Ji Hae Linda Yum DiMarco ("Yum"), a Canadian citizen, with regard to claims brought by appellant, Prouse, Dash & Crouch, L.L.P. ("Prouse"), a Canadian law firm. Because we conclude that DiMarco was a resident of Ohio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases