OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) served the respondent with a petition dated March 13, 2006, containing five charges of professional misconduct. The respondent served an answer dated April 18, 2006, and an amended answer dated April 25, 2006. Thereafter, he did not make an appearance at a telephonic preliminary conference which had been scheduled on notice for July...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.