1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 15 Misc.3d
  5. 15 Misc.3d 11 (2007)
 

OMANSKY v. BERMONT HOLDINGS LTD.

15 Misc.3d 11 (2007)

832 N.Y.S.2d 379

LAWRENCE A. OMANSKY, Respondent, v. BERMONT HOLDINGS LTD. et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 16, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tedd Blecher, New York City, appellant pro se, and for Bermont Holdings Ltd., appellant.

Lawrence A. Omansky, New York City, respondent pro se.

McKEON, P.J., DAVIS and SCHOENFELD, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, entered on or about March 1, 2006, reversed, with $10 costs, and cross motion denied.

Defendant Blecher's disqualification as counsel for defendant Bermont Holdings Ltd. under the advocate witness rule (Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102 [a] [22 NYCRR 1200.21 (a)]) was unwarranted. Inasmuch as Blecher is one of two shareholders in Bermont, a limited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases