1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 40 A.D.3d
  5. 40 A.D.3d 207 (2007)
 

FARKAS v. FARKAS

40 A.D.3d 207 (2007)

835 N.Y.S.2d 118

ARLENE C. FARKAS, Respondent, v. BRUCE R. FARKAS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 1, 2007.

The Court of Appeals has recently made it clear that "statutory time frames—like court-ordered time frames—are not options, they are requirements, to be taken seriously by the parties" (Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 N.Y.3d 725, 726 [2004] [citation omitted], following Brill v City of New York, 2 N.Y.3d 648 [2004]). Thus, where a statute or court rule prescribes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases