1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 54 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 185 (2007)
 

ROEHL v. RITCHIE

No. G036999.

54 Cal.Rptr.3d 185 (2007)

147 Cal.App.4th 338

Jeffrey S. ROEHL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Mariana RITCHIE, Defendant and Appellant; Kenneth J. Cummins, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

January 31, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rutan & Tucker, Theodore I. Wallace, Jr., and Treg A. Julander, Costa Mesa, for Defendant and Appellant.

Goldstein, Gellman, Melbostad, Gibson & Harris and Paul H. Melbostad, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Bidna & Keys, Howard M. Bidna and Jon A. Longerbone, Newport Beach, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

An arbitrator cannot amend an award after the trial court has confirmed it. We articulated that "reasonable, bright line test" in Delaney v. Dahl (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 647, 659, 121 Cal.Rptr.2d 663 (Delaney), and will not redraw it here.

The judgment below passes the Delaney test.

Here, an arbitrator in a trust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases