PER CURIAM.
The Appellant asserts that the trial court erred when it deviated from the commitment-level placement recommended by the Department of Juvenile Justice and ordered that Appellant provide a sample of his DNA. We find that the trial court's deviation was based on an appropriate consideration, the need to protect the community, which was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See J.L.K. v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.