PER CURIAM.
Appellant alleged in his rule 3.800(a) motion that his two consecutive sentences are illegal because the convictions for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft arose from the same criminal episode. We reverse because the order denying his motion states no reasons for the denial and there are no records attached which would refute the claim.
Reversed.
STONE, KLEIN and TAYLOR...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.