HOLLAND v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

No. C052833.

65 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 (2007)

154 Cal.App.4th 940

Tim HOLLAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Third District.

As Modified August 29, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Lockshin, Esq., Larry Lockshin and Diana Esquivel for plaintiff and appellant.

Randolph, Cregger & Chalfant, Thomas A. Cregger and Stephanie L. Quinn for defendant and respondent.


DAVIS, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff Tim Holland filed this action alleging employment discrimination. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) successfully moved for summary judgment. In his timely appeal from the ensuing judgment, the plaintiff first contends that the court commissioner who heard the motion lacked jurisdiction as a judge pro tem over the matter. In the interests of judicial economy, we decline to reach the issue because the substantive issue will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases