1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 922 A.2d
  5. 922 A.2d 1056 (2007)
 

TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS v. DAIGLE

No. 17591.

922 A.2d 1056 (2007)

282 Conn. 418

TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS, P.C. v. Andrew J. DAIGLE.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 15, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, with whom, on the brief, was Matthew J. Curtiss, for the appellant (plaintiff).

James H. Lee, Fairfield, with whom were Martin M. Rutchik, Norwich, and Andrew J. Daigle, pro se, for the appellee (defendant).

BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js.

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

The primary issue in this appeal1 is whether the trial court properly awarded attorney's fees to the defendant, Andrew J. Daigle, pursuant to General Statutes § 42-150bb2 on the basis of a bill of costs filed pursuant to Practice Book § 18-5.3 We conclude that it did not and we reverse the judgment of the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases