LINDHOLM v. BRANT

No. 17729.

925 A.2d 1048 (2007)

283 Conn. 65

Kerstin LINDHOLM v. Peter M. BRANT et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 3, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence I. Weinstein, pro hac vice, with whom were Anthony M. Fitzgerald, and, on the brief, Mara Lainie Taylor, pro hac vice, David S. Hardy, New Haven, and Kurt Hansson, Stamford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Wesley W. Horton, with whom were Karen L. Dowd, Hartford, and, on the brief, Jay H. Sandak, Gary S. Klein and Stephanie McLaughlin, Stamford, for the appellee (named defendant et al.).

BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ, ZARELLA and SULLIVAN, Js.


SULLIVAN, J.

The plaintiff, Kerstin Lindholm, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, Peter M. Brant,2 on the plaintiff's claim of conversion of a painting by Andy Warhol entitled "Red Elvis" (Red Elvis). The plaintiff claims on appeal that the trial court improperly determined that the defendant was a buyer in the ordinary course of business and, therefore, lawfully took...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases