THOMAS, J.
Appellant appeals the hearing officer's final order upholding Appellee's ("the Agency") action approving 6 hours of personal care assistance rather than the requested 9.173 hours. Appellant raises three arguments on appeal: (1) the hearing officer erred by applying a more restrictive definition of medical necessity, (2) the order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, and (3) the Agency failed to meet its burden of proof that the reduction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
