1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d 143 (2007)
 

NEILSON v. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

No. F049143.

53 Cal.Rptr.3d 143 (2007)

146 Cal.App.4th 633

N.L. NEILSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Association for Legal Desert Development et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. City of California City et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District.

January 9, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Murray O. Kane, June Ailin, Los Angeles, and Donald P. Johnson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Motschiedler, Michaelides & Wishon and C. William Brewer, Fresno, for Won Gin Ng and Rose Ng as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Tom Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General,

J. Matthew Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel L. Siegel, Deputy Attorney General for Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bernard C. Barmann, Sr., County Counsel (Kern), and Stephen D. Schuett, Assistant County Counsel, for County of Kern as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Price, Postel & Parma, Todd A. Amspoker, Mark S. Manion, Santa Barbara; Kuhs & Parker, Robert G. Kuhs, Bakersfield; and R. Bruce Tepper for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION,

DAWSON, J.

Appellants challenged the validity of redevelopment plan amendments adopted by respondents City of California City (City) and City of California City Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) that resulted in the building of an automobile test track facility on desert land. Appellants claim Redevelopment Agency erroneously determined that the 24.4 square miles of vacant land added...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases