KHAN v. SINGH


936 A.2d 987 (2007)

397 N.J. Super. 184

Mohammed KHAN and Tasmih Khan, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sunil K. SINGH, M.D.; Minimally Invasive Surgery Center; Interventional Neurology, Headache & Pain Relief Center, Defendants-Respondents, and Trimedyne, Inc., Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 12, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth G. Andres, Jr., Haddonfield, argued the cause for appellants (Andres & Berger, attorneys; Mr. Andres, on the brief).

Thomas B. Reynolds, Absecon, argued the cause for respondents (Reynolds & Drake, attorneys; Mr. Reynolds and John J. Bannan, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WINKELSTEIN and YANNOTTI.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Mohammed Khan filed a complaint against defendants Sunil Singh, M.D., Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, and Interventional Neurology, Headache and Pain Relief Center, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of certain medical treatment rendered by Dr. Singh.1 The matter was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict of no cause for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases