1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 521 F.Supp.2d
  5. 521 F.Supp.2d 1395 (2007)
 

SNR ROULEMENTS v. U.S.

Slip Op. 07-161, Court No. 01-00686.

521 F.Supp.2d 1395 (2007)

SNR ROULEMENTS, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Corp., NSK Bearings Europe, Ltd., NSK Ltd., NTN-BCA Corp., NTN Bower Corp., NTN-Driveshaft, Inc., American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Bearing Corp. of America, NTN Corp., Inaschaeffler KG, INA USA Corp., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Timken U.S. Corp., f/k/a "The Torrington Company", Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

November 2, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman & Klestadt, LLP (Bruce Mitchell), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff SNR Roulements.

Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP (Neil R. Ellis), Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.

Crowell & Moring, LLP (Matthew P. Jaffe and Robert A. Lipstein), Washington, tiC, for Plaintiffs NSK Corporation, NSK Bearings Europe, Ltd., and NSK Ltd.

Baker & McKenzie, LLP (Donald J. Unger, Diane Alexa MacDonald and Louisa Vassilova Carney), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs NTN-BCA Corporation, NTN Bower Corporation, NTN-Driveshaft, Inc., American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Bearing Corporation of America and NTN Corporation.

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal (Stephen L. Gibson), Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs INA-Schaeffler KG and INA USA Corporation.

Michael F. Hertz, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice; (Claudia Burke); Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (Deborah King), Of Counsel, for Defendant United States.

Stewart & Stewart (Geert M. DePrest and William A. Fennell), Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenor Timken U.S. Corp.

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.

This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' joint motion for extension of the existing preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs also request that this motion be heard on an expedited basis. For reasons indicated below, this Court denies Plaintiffs' motions.

I. BACKGROUND

In September 2001, Koyo Seiko Co. Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NTN-BCA Corp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases