1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 501 F.3d
  5. 501 F.3d 1364 (2007)
 

ADENTA GMBH v. ORTHOARM, INC.

Nos. 2006-1571, 2006-1598.

501 F.3d 1364 (2007)

ADENTA GMBH, Dr. Wolfgang Heiser, and Claus Schendell, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. ORTHOARM, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and American Orthodontics Corporation, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 19, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Fredrickson, Boyle Fredrickson Newholm Stein & Gratz, S.C., of New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants.

Thomas S. Reynolds II, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, of Milwaukee, WI, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Timothy M. Hansen.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, Circuit Judge, and ROBERTSON, District Judge.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

OrthoArm, Inc. appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin denying its motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and its motion, following a jury verdict, for judgment as a matter of law that claims 1-8 and 10-13 of U.S. Patent 6,257,883 (the "'883 patent") are not invalid. Adenta GmbH v. OrthoArm, No. 04-C-905...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases