1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 481 F.3d
  5. 481 F.3d 1371 (2007)
 

LIEBEL-FLARSHEIM CO. v. MEDRAD, INC.

Nos. 06-1156, 06-1157.

481 F.3d 1371 (2007)

LIEBEL-FLARSHEIM COMPANY and Mallinckrodt, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDRAD, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 22, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Robert Chambers, Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., of Cincinnati, OH, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Theodore R. Remaklus.

W. Thomas McGough, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Frederick H. Colen, Barry J. Coyne, and Kirsten R. Rydstrom. Of counsel on the brief was Gregory L. Bradley, Medrad Inc., of Indianola, PA.

Before LOURIE, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. (collectively "Liebel") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granting Medrad's motion for summary judgment that four of Liebel's patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 112 and 102. Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc., No. 01-CV-98-858, 2005 WL 2840744 (S.D.Ohio Oct. 28, 2005). Medrad cross-appeals from the decision of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases