PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to timely and properly object to an expert witness reading from a medical publication during her direct testimony and his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State having first and last closing arguments. We affirm the trial court's denial of the second claim without further discussion. However, with respect to Appellant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
