1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 503 F.Supp.2d
  5. 503 F.Supp.2d 1325 (2007)
 

JONES EX REL. CSK AUTO CORP. v. JENKINS

No. 06-01881-PHX-DGC.

503 F.Supp.2d 1325 (2007)

Joyce W. JONES, Derivative on behalf of CSK AUTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Maynard L. JENKINS, Jr; Martin G. Fraser; Don W. Watson; Morton Godlas; James G. Bazlen; Charles K. Marquis; Terilyn A. Henderson; Charles J. Philippin; William A. Shutzer; James O. Egan; Simon Moore; Christopher J. Stadler, Defendants. and CSK Auto Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

August 24, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Robbins, Cathy K. Kazemi, Marc M. Umeda, Robbins Umeda & Fink LLP, San Diego, CA, Richard Glenn Himelrick, Salvador Ongaro, Tiffany & Bosco PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Joyce W. Jones Derivatively on Behalf of CSK Auto Corporation.

Donald Wayne Bivens, Patricia Lee Refo, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, AZ, Dean Joel Kitchens, Gareth T. Evans, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Maynard L. Jenkins, Jr., Morton Godlas, James G. Bazlen, Charles K. Marquis, Terilyn A. Henderson, Charles J. Philippin, William A. Shutzer, James 0. Egan, Simon Moore, Christopher J. Stadler, CSK Auto Corporation a Delaware Corporation.

Ethan Joseph Brown, Rebecca Bree Torres, Yasmin N. Best, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Edward F. Novak, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Martin G. Fraser.

James M. McGuire, Jeffrey Dale Gardner, Paul J. Roshka, Jr., Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Don W. Watson.

Nathan Michael Smith, Snell & Wilmer LLP, Phoenix, AZ, CSK Auto Corporation a Delaware Corporation.

Mark A. Nadeau, Susan Tabitha Watson, Dla Piper US LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for James B. Riley.

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Nominal Defendant CSK Auto, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for failure to plead demand futility. Dkt. # 62. The Court has reviewed the memoranda submitted by the parties. Dkt. ## 62, 69, 72. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant's motion.1

I. Background.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases