1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 474 F.3d
  5. 474 F.3d 1344 (2007)
 

HYDRIL CO. LP v. GRANT PRIDECO LP

No. 2006-1188.

474 F.3d 1344 (2007)

HYDRIL COMPANY LP, and Hydril U.K. Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GRANT PRIDECO LP and Grant Prideco, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 25, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Hawes, Baker Botts L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Mitchell Lukin and David M. Rodi.

William J. Boyce, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Gerard G. Pecht and Paul Krieger.

Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge MAYER.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal challenges the district court's dismissal, under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a valid claim for relief, of a complaint alleging that the defendant (1) monopolized two product markets by enforcing a patent that had been obtained by fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office, (2) infringed a different patent that the appellant owns...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases