COM. v. KING


939 A.2d 877 (2007)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Duane KING, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Resubmitted September 25, 2007.

Decided December 28, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Michael Levy, Lynne M. Abraham, Ronald Eisenberg, Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia Dist. Attorney's Office, for the Com. of PA, appellant.

Sheryl Stern Chernoff, for Duane King, appellee.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN and FITZGERALD, JJ.


OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.*

The question presented in this appeal is the proper interpretation of the perjury statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4902, in a case involving multiple falsehoods made by the same witness during a single judicial proceeding. The Superior Court concluded that the trial court erred by failing to conduct an individualized analysis of the alleged perjurious statements. Accordingly, the court vacated the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases