1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 926 A.2d
  5. 926 A.2d 890 (2007)
 

LISSNER v. MARBURGER

926 A.2d 890 (2007)

394 N.J. Super. 393

Clark LISSNER, Plaintiff, v. Beverly MARBURGER a/k/a Lissner, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Mercer County.

Decided February 16, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Scott Chasar, Trenton, for plaintiff.

Mia Cahill, Princeton, for defendant (Dennigan Cahill, P.C., attorneys).

OSTRER, J.S.C.

Plaintiff Clark Lissner wants to reduce his child support obligation for his teenage daughter and college-age son because he voluntarily retired at age sixty-one and reduced his income by over $25,000 a year. His motion raises the question whether child support should be treated the same as alimony, when an obligor seeks a reduction because of retirement. See, e.g., Silvan v. Sylvan, 267 N.J.Super. 578

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases