1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 927 A.2d
  5. 927 A.2d 880 (2007)
 

HAYES v. CAMEL

No. 17430.

927 A.2d 880 (2007)

283 Conn. 475

Frederick HAYES et al. v. Mark H. CAMEL et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 7, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua D. Koskoff, Bridgeport, with whom was Cynthia C. Bott, Milford, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Catherine S. Nietzel, Stamford, for the appellees (defendants).

NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js.

NORCOTT, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether, in a medical malpractice action without a claim of lack of informed consent, the trial court properly admitted testimonial and documentary evidence that the defendant surgeon had informed his patient of the risks of the medical procedure in question. The plaintiffs, Frederick Hayes and Barbara Hayes,1 brought this action for medical malpractice and loss of consortium against the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases