AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
v.
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., CK Electronics, Incorporated, Conti Temic Microelectronic, GmbH, and Temic Automotive of North America, Incorporated, Defendants, and
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, Honda Motor Company Limited, American Honda Motor Company, Incorporated, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Saab Cars USA, Inc., Siemens Automotive Corporation, and Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees, and
General Motors Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee, and
Volkswagen of America, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant, and
Nissan North America, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant, and
Calsonic Kansei Corporation, Counterclaimant Defendant-Cross Appellant, and
Siemens AG, TK Electronics, Incorporated, and TRW Automotive U.S., LLC, Counterclaimants Defendants-Appellees, and
Delphi Automotive Systems, Counterclaimant Defendant-Appellee, and
KIA Motors America, Incorporated, and Bosch Automotive Motors System Corporation, Counterclaimants Defendants.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 6, 2007.
September 6, 2007.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael H. Baniak, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was Andrew Kochanowski, Sommers Schwartz, P.C., of Southfield, Michigan. Of counsel was Michael D. Gannon.
Kenneth A. Gallo, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees, Daimlerchrysler Corporation, et al., and counterclaimants defendants-appellees Siemens AG, et al. Of counsel on the brief were Drew M. Wintringham III and Mark W. Rueh, Clifford Chance U.S. LLP, of New York, New York.
Charles W. Shifley, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, for counterclaimant defendant-appellee, Delphi Automotive Systems, and defendant/counterclaimant-appellee, General Motors Corporation. With him on the brief were Binal J. Patel and Theodore L. Field.
John J. Feldhaus, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-cross appellant, Nissan North America, and counterclaimant defendant-cross appellant, Calsonic Kansei Corporation. With him on the brief were Pavan K. Agarwal and Mary M. Calkins.
Before LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. ("ATI") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granting summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1-44 of U.S. Patent 5, 231, 253 (the "'253 patent") under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1. ATI also appeals from the decision of the district court granting summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of various defendants. Auto. Tech. Int'l...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
