1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 499 F.3d
  5. 499 F.3d 1272 (2007)
 

SHUM v. INTEL CORP.

No. 2006-1249.

499 F.3d 1272 (2007)

Frank T. SHUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEL CORPORATION, LightLogic, Inc., and Jean-Marc Verdiell, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 24, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Kirsch, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were George M. Schwab and Mark T. Jansen.

Stephen E. Taylor, Taylor & Company Law Offices, Inc., of San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Stacey L. Wexler and Tyler G. Newby. Of counsel was Mark A. Lemley, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, of San Francisco, CA.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Frank T. Shum appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing his claims for correction of inventorship pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and various state law claims, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases