PERELMAN v. CASIELLO


920 A.2d 782 (2007)

392 N.J. Super. 412

Raymond G. PERELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nicholas CASIELLO, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 26, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry L. Katz of the Pennsylvania Bar, Bala Cynwyd, PA, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Hollstein Keating Cattell Johnson & Goldstein, attorneys; Stuart M. Goldstein, Philadelphia, PA and Mr. Katz, on the brief).

Eric G. Fikry, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondent (Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, attorneys; Stephen D. Schrier and Mr. Fikry, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges LISA, HOLSTON, JR. and GRALL.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRALL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Raymond G. Perelman and defendant Nicholas Casiello are owners of adjacent ocean-front property in Atlantic City. Restrictive covenants in their respective chains of title establish a setback that runs parallel to and over 100 feet inland from the boardwalk and prohibit construction of more than one residence. Plaintiff commenced this action for declaratory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases