J & J CELCOM v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.

No. 05-35567.

508 F.3d 1177 (2007)

J & J CELCOM; Lupe Azevedo; Woodrow W. Holmes, Jr.; Lucille Hoss; Daniel Murray; Rajive Oberoi; Kenneth L. Ramsey; Gary R. Robbins; Joanne Robbins; S & D Partnership; Cell-Cal IX-T9; Nancy Donnelly; Rodger D. Friz; Sid Danny Hoff; Om Parkash Kalra; Ronald Wilson; Delchi Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.; McCaw Cellular Interests Inc.; AT & T Wireless Services of Colorado LLC; AT & T Wireless Services of Idaho Inc.; AT & T Wireless Services of Washington LLC; Boise City Cellular Partnership, formerly known as New Boise City Cellular Partnership; Fort Collins-Loveland Cellular Telephone Co., formerly known as New Fort Collins-Loveland Cellular Telephone Company; Greeley Cellular Co., formerly known as New Greeley Cellular Company; Yakima Cellular Telephone Company, formerly known as New Yakima Cellular Telephone Company; McCaw Communications of Wheeling, Inc.; McCaw Communications of Texarkana, Inc.; AT & T Wireless Services of California, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed November 21, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Oitzinger, Helena, MT, Thomas W. Hayton, Cutler Nylander & Hayton, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Brendan T. Mangan, Heller Ehrman LLP, Seattle, WA, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: PAMELA ANN RYMER, MARSHA S. BERZON, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

On March 26, 2003, plaintiff J & J Celcom along with other former owners of minority interests in nine general partnerships involving cellular telephone businesses filed a diversity suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington alleging that the defendants, AT & T Wireless, Inc. (AWS) and nine of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, violated Washington State law when AWS sold its controlling interests in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases