PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Assuming, without deciding, that the prosecutor's cross-examination question was fairly susceptible of being interpreted as a comment on the appellant's silence at the time of arrest, see State v. Hoggins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.