BLUME LAW FIRM PC v. PIERCE

No. A06-2311.

741 N.W.2d 921 (2007)

BLUME LAW FIRM PC, an Arizona professional corporation, Respondent, v. Jason E. PIERCE, et al., Defendants, Raymond R. Pierce, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 4, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick R. Kopplin, Kopplin Law Offices, P.A., Minneapolis, MN and Lee R. Johnson, Johnson & Greenberg, PLLP, St. Louis Park, MN, for appellants.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; LANSING, Judge; and KLAPHAKE, Judge.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The district court denied Raymond and Linda Pierce's motion to vacate an Arizona judgment docketed in Minnesota under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. We conclude that the district court properly rejected the Pierces' jurisdictional argument. But because the record indicates that the Arizona judgment may have been obtained through fraud, we reverse and remand.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases