HUTNICK v. ARI MUT. INS. CO.


918 A.2d 729 (2007)

391 N.J. Super. 524

Michael HUTNICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ARI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 4, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Welch, Manasquan, argued the cause for appellant.

Jason E. Shamy, New Brunswick, argued the cause for respondent (Shamy, Shipers & Lonski, attorneys; Mr. Shamy, on the brief).

Before Judges LEFELT, PARRILLO and SAPP-PETERSON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

Underinsured motorist (UIM) insurer, ARI Mutual Insurance Company (ARI or defendant), appeals from a December 13, 2005 order of the Law Division allowing the UIM claim of insured Michael Hutnick (plaintiff or Hutnick) to proceed to arbitration and rejecting ARI's contention that its insured's Longworth notification1 was insufficient and therefore excused the insurer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases