1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 859 N.E.2d
  5. 859 N.E.2d 786 (2007)
 

CITIZENS INS. CO. v. GANSCHOW

No. 18A02-0604-CV-312.

859 N.E.2d 786 (2007)

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Defendant, v. Cletus GANSCHOW, Appellee-Plaintiff, and Louis Pipito III and Standard Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

January 12, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Sutherland, Law Offices of Hanover Ins. Group, Broadview Heights, OH, Attorney for Appellant.

Mark R. Smith, Smith Fisher Maas & Howard, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

This case involves the interpretation of two automobile insurance policies. Although both insurance companies agree that an injured passenger qualified as an insured under both policies, they disagree as to the amount of damages that each should pay.

Appellant-defendant Citizens Insurance Company (Citizens Insurance) appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Standard Mutual Insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases