On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 6, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall include but not be limited to addressing: (1) whether the "public duty" doctrine, as set forth in White v. Beasley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KOULTA v. CITY OF CENTERLINE
Docket No. 131891. COA No. 266886.
728 N.W.2d 864 (2007)
Hany F. KOULTA, Personal Representative for the Estate of Sami F. Koulta, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CENTERLINE, Defendant, and Daniel Merciez, Robert Wroblewski, and Steven Hilla, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 30, 2007.
March 30, 2007.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.