1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 501 F.Supp.2d
  5. 501 F.Supp.2d 1068 (2007)
 

POLYVISION CORP. v. SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Nos. 1:03-CV-476, 1:04-CV-713.

501 F.Supp.2d 1068 (2007)

POLYVISION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC. and Smart Technologies Corporation, Defendants. Smart Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. PolyVision Corporation and Paragram Sales Company, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

June 1, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig H. Lubben, Miller Johnson PLC, Kalamazoo, MI, George Pazuniak, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC, Wilmington, DE, Jon G. March, Miller Johnson PLC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff.

Scott M. Gettleson, Timothy J. Vezeau, Manotti L. Jenkins, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL, Stephen D. Turner, Clark Hill PLC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendants.

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

Plaintiff, PolyVision Corporation ("PolyVision"), has sued Defendants, Smart Technologies, Inc. and Smart Technologies Corporation (collectively "Smart"), in Case No. 1:03-CV-476, alleging that Smart is willfully infringing United States Patent No. 5,838,309 (the "'309 patent") and that PolyVision is not infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,448,263 (the '263 patent") and 6,141,000 (the "'000 patent"), owned by Smart. Subsequent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases