IN RE TABLEWARE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. C-04-3514 VRW.

484 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2007)

In re TABLEWARE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 12, 2007.


ORDER

WALKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases allege that May Department Stores Co. ("May") and Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated"), which operate department stores across the United States, and Lenox, Inc. ("Lenox") and Waterford Wedgwood, USA ("Waterford"), both of which produce fine tableware sold in the United States, conspired with one another to boycott Bed, Bath and Beyond...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases