1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 495 F.Supp.2d
  5. 495 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2007)
 

SINGLE CHIP SYSTEMS CORP. v. INTERMEC IP CORP.

No. CIV. 04CV1517JAH(CAB).

495 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2007)

SINGLE CHIP SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Neology, S. de R.L. de C.V., Plaintiffs, v. INTERMEC IP CORP., Transcore, LP and Transcore Holdings, Inc., Defendants. Transcore, 12, Counter-claimant, v. Single Chip Systems Corporation and Neology, S. de R.L. de C.V., Counter-defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

June 29, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. O'Connor, Baker and McKenzie, Chicago, IL, Howard N. Wisnia, Cynthia A. Freeland, Dongkwan James Pak, James P. Conley, Baker and McKenzie, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants.

Bruce R. Zisser, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver and Hedges, William J. Robinson, Stephen M. Lobbin, Foley and Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, Carson P. Veach, Jacob D. Koering, Freeborn and Peters, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING TRANSCORE'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE GOLDBERG DECLARATION

HOUSTON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Now pending before this Court are Plaintiffs Single Chip Systems Corp. and Neology, S. de R.L. de C.V.'s (collectively "Plaintiffs") renewed motion for summary judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and Defendants TransCore LP and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases