1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 926 A.2d
  5. 926 A.2d 633 (2007)
 

STATE v. SAUCIER

No. 17502.

926 A.2d 633 (2007)

283 Conn. 207

STATE of Connecticut v. Richard SAUCIER.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 17, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, with whom, on the brief was, Caitlin McCann, law student intern, for the appellant (defendant).

Julia K. Conlin, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were John A. Connelly, state's attorney, and Robin Lipsky, senior assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, VERTE FE UILLE, ZARELLA and SULLIVAN, Js.

KATZ, J.

The issue in this certified appeal is whether a particular statement made by the victim1 to an acquaintance in reference to the defendant, Richard Saucier, the day after she had identified the defendant as her attacker, should have been admitted into evidence at trial pursuant to the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule, § 8-3(4) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases