Further appellate review denied without prejudice.
Reported below:
The Appeals Court should not have resolved the appeal on the basis of the seventeen-month delay (the time during which the defendant's Mass. R. Crim. P. 36 motion was under advisement), because the record as it presently stands is not sufficiently developed to permit a resolution on that point; specifically, factual questions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
