STATE v. KENT


918 A.2d 626 (2007)

391 N.J. Super. 352

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Adam J. KENT, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 22, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan M. Levow argued the cause for appellant (Levow & Costello, attorneys; Mr. Levow and Kevin Leckerman, Cherry Hill, on the brief).

Christopher W. Hsieh, Senior Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (James F. Avigliano, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Hsieh, of counsel and on the brief).

Daniel I. Bornstein, Deputy Attorney General, (Stuart Rabner, Attorney General, attorney), amicus curiae, submitted a post-argument letter-brief at the court's request.1

Before Judges STERN, COLLESTER and SABATINO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

SABATINO, J.S.C., temporarily assigned.

This drunk driving case presents another instance concerning the admissibility of hearsay documents under the Confrontation Clause of the Federal and state Constitutions, in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (reinterpreting the Confrontation Clause to bar the admission against the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases