On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's June 22, 2007 orders is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the orders were entered erroneously.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
For the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement at 478 Mich. 916,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.