1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 922 A.2d
  5. 922 A.2d 576 (2007)
 

LAYTON v. HOWARD COUNTY BD. OF APPEALS

No. 116, Sept. Term, 2006.

922 A.2d 576 (2007)

399 Md. 36

Colleen LAYTON, et al. v. HOWARD COUNTY BOARD Of APPEALS, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 9, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Albert Figinski (Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, Baltimore, on brief), Fred M. Lauer, Baltimore, for petitioners.

Thomas M. Meachum (Reese & Carney, LLP, Columbia, on brief), Barry M. Sanders, Asst. County Solicitor (Howard County Office of Law, Ellicott City, on brief), for respondents.

Argued before Bell, C.J., Raker, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Alan M. Wilner, (Retired specially assigned), JJ.

CATHELL, J.

This case, in a land use or zoning context, addresses the question of the retrospective applicability of a related statutory law which is amended during the course of litigation. It presents the issue of whether the rule in Yorkdale Corporation v. Powell, 237 Md. 121, 205 A.2d 269 (1964), may be applied to enlarge uses as well as to limit uses.

Colleen Layton and Scott Robbins...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases