1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 471 F.Supp.2d
  5. 471 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2007)
 

EDWARDS v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.

No. C 05-3076 BZ.

471 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2007)

Kathleen EDWARDS, Plaintiff(s), v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 5, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy S. Thimesch, Thimesch Law Offices, Walnut Creek, CA, Gene A. Farber, Law Offices of Gene A. Farber, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Ronald Konrad Losch, Kaye, Rose & Partners, LLC, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS UNDER: RULES 59 AND 60

ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before me is plaintiffs motion for a new trial and/or for clarification or, in the alternative, motion for relief from the judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues. I find no need for argument and vacate the hearing presently scheduled for January 10, 2007. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases