PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Madry appeals the revocation of his probation and ensuing prison sentence. He alleges that the State failed to meet its burden of proof at the revocation hearing because it relied on an out-of-court declaration by a witness who testified at the hearing that he never made any declaration out of court and did not "know any person by the name of Tyrone Madry." Unable to distinguish Baugh v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.