1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 972 So.2d
  5. 972 So.2d 495 (2007)
 

TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. GRAY CORP.

No. 2006-CA-00218-SCT.

972 So.2d 495 (2007)

The TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. The GRAY CORPORATION, INC. and The Gray Corporation, Inc. v. Ronald J. Ragland, Sr. d/b/a Ragland Engineering and Ragland Construction and Ronald J. Ragland, Sr. d/b/a Ragland Engineering and Ragland Construction v. The Tupelo Redevelopment Agency.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 18, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin B. Smith, Guy W. Mitchell, William Daniel Prestage, William G. Armistead, Sr., Tupelo, attorneys for appellant.

B. Sean Akins, Ripley, Thomas W. Prewitt, Kenneth Martin Heard, III, attorneys for appellees.

Before DIAZ, P.J., CARLSON and RANDOLPH, JJ.

CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. After a jury trial, the Circuit Court of Lee County entered a judgment in favor of the Gray Corporation, Inc., and against the Tupelo Redevelopment Agency for $258,118; and likewise entered a judgment in favor of Ronald J. Ragland, Sr., d/b/a Ragland Engineering and Ragland Construction and against the Gray Corporation for $1,216,605.20. The Tupelo Redevelopment Agency appeals from the judgment entered against it, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases