1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 956 So.2d
  5. 956 So.2d 509 (2007)
 

McNAMARA v. CITY OF LAKE WORTH

Nos. 4D06-1766, 4D06-2053.

956 So.2d 509 (2007)

Laurence McNAMARA, Drew Martin, and Anabeth Karson, and their attorneys, Littman, Sherlock & Heims, P.A. and Howard K. Heims, Esquire, Appellants, v. CITY OF LAKE WORTH, a Florida municipal corporation, and Regina Campbell, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 25, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard K. Heims and Virginia P. Sherlock of Littman, Sherlock & Heims, P.A., Stuart, for appellants.

Ronald E. Crescenzo of Casey Ciklin Lubitz Martens McBane & O'Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellee City of Lake Worth.

STEVENSON, C.J.

Lawrence McNamara, Drew Martin and Anabeth Karson filed a complaint against the City of Lake Worth under Florida Statutes section 163.3215, challenging the adoption of ordinance 2004-12. The trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of Lake Worth because the complaint did not comply with section 163.3215, in that it was not timely filed. This court affirmed the final judgment in McNamara v. City of Lake Worth, 923...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases