In re Carla FREEMAN,
Carla Freeman, Petitioner,
v.
United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Respondent,
Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General; Michael Chertoff; William McNamee; Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Filed May 29, 2007.
Filed May 29, 2007.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Brent W. Renison, Parrilli Renison, LLC, Lake Oswego, OR, for Petitioner.
Kenneth C. Bauman, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark O. Hatfield, Portland, OR, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Francis W. Fraser, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Real Parties in Interest.
Before: RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
ORDER
In Freeman v. Gonzales,444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2006), we decided that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) erred in two respects in refusing to adjudicate Carla Freeman's application for adjustment of status. First, we decided that DHS was incorrect that entry into the United States through the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) precluded Freeman from availing herself of the procedural protections afforded to other applicants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
