IN RE CARTER


924 A.2d 525 (2007)

191 N.J. 474

In the Matter of John CARTER. John Carter, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Township of Bordentown, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 20, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory J. Sullivan, Hamilton, argued the cause for appellant (Hartsough Kenny Chase & Sullivan, attorneys).

Mark W. Catanzaro, Moorestown, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Catanzaro, attorney; Mr. Catanzaro and Ashley H. Auerbach, on the briefs).

Todd A. Wigder, Deputy Attorney General, submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of respondent Merit System Board (Stuart Rabner, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


Justice HOENS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bordentown Police Officer John Carter was served with a series of disciplinary notices charging him with, among other things, sleeping on duty. Although the Merit System Board upheld the penalty of termination for that offense, the Appellate Division reversed, concluding that imposition of that sanction violated the principle of progressive discipline. We granted the Township of Bordentown's petition for certification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases