U.S. v. HENDRIX

No. 05-3644.

482 F.3d 962 (2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence HENDRIX, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 9, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Getter (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Allan A. Ackerman (argued), Robert A. Willis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and RIPPLE and MANION, Circuit Judges.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted defendant Clarence Hendrix of one count of distributing at least fifty grams of crack cocaine. The conviction arose out of a drug transaction with a confidential informant. Hendrix appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that he was entitled to a missing witness jury instruction after the confidential informant failed to testify, that the government improperly used the confidential informant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases