1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 914 A.2d
  5. 914 A.2d 524 (2007)
 

PEDRO v. MILLER

No. 17482.

914 A.2d 524 (2007)

281 Conn. 112

Cristin PEDRO v. Joseph MILLER et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 23, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. O'Keefe, with whom was Joseph M. Busher, Jr., Hartford, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

Robert E. Kiley, with whom was Bradley M. Smolkin, and, on the brief, Elizabeth Adams, Hartford, for the appellee (plaintiff).

BORDEN, KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js.

BORDEN, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of the present case, equitable reasons existed to toll the statute of limitations for serving an apportionment complaint. The defendants, Joseph Miller and Builders, Inc., appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss the apportionment defendant, Edward Hargus, based on the failure of Miller to serve the apportionment complaint upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases