1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 649 S.E.2d
  5. 649 S.E.2d 753 (2007)
 

VITO v. INMAN

Nos. A07A0161, A07A0162.

649 S.E.2d 753 (2007)

VITO v. INMAN et al. Inman et al. v. Vito.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied July 18, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Hull, for appellant.

Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, James T. McDonald, Jr., Christopher Fox II, Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Terrance C. Sullivan, Atlanta, for appellees.

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

George R. Vito, a podiatrist, performed a surgical procedure known as "limb lengthening" on several patients. Mark Inman, an attorney, sued Vito on behalf of one such patient, Sabih Kalidy, who alleged Vito committed negligence per se and medical malpractice in connection with the procedure. That case was settled. Inman also filed a negligence and malpractice action against Vito's professional corporation, The Foot and Leg Centers of Georgia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases