THAYER v. FULLER & HENRY, LTD.

No. 3:05CV7275.

503 F.Supp.2d 887 (2007)

Jack A. THAYER, Plaintiff v. FULLER & HENRY, LTD., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

April 18, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Zoll, Pamela A. Borgess, Zoll & Kranz, Toledo, OH, for Plaintiff.

Robert M. Anspach, Gregory H. Wagoner, Jessica W. Straub, Anspach Meeks Ellenberger, Toledo, OH, for Defendants:


ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Jack Thayer brings this legal malpractice suit against his former attorneys, defendants Fuller & Henry, Ltd. (Fuller & Henry) and David R. Bainbridge. Pending is defendants' summary judgment motion, in which defendants argue that Thayer's action is barred by Ohio's one-year statute of limitations on legal malpractice actions. Because I conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to when the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases