CURISKIS v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. A06-982.

729 N.W.2d 655 (2007)

Juris CURISKIS, Appellant, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 10, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juris Curiskis, Minneapolis, MN, pro se appellant.

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Edward A. Backstrom, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge; TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

On appeal from a summary judgment for the city in this special-assessment dispute, pro se appellant argues that the district court miscalculated the filing deadline for challenging a special assessment when it ruled that appellant's appeal was untimely and, therefore, the district court lacked jurisdiction to address the challenge. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

On April 19, 2005, the City of Minneapolis sent notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases